7 July 2000
Down and out
This was Gerry Conlon's moment. There
he is, jumping for freedom, an innocent man who'd served 15 years for the
Guildford Four pub bombings. Today he is a broken man. And the system that
broke him has done little to put him back together again. That has been
left to a network of the falsely convicted, whose members know to their
cost the real price of freedom
By Steve Boggan
It is one of the enduring images of the 20th century.
Gerry Conlon, with his sisters Anne and Bridie clinging joyfully to him,
emerges from the Old Bailey, handsome, smiling and punching the air as
he is freed after 15 years of wrongful imprisonment.
For Conlon and the rest of the men who had been convicted
of two pub bombings in Guildford in 1974, the past had been defined by
corrupt police officers, complicit forensic scientists and gullible courts.
They had endured terrible beatings, isolation and despair. But on that
day in October 1989, the future finally looked bright.
Fast forward 11 years. Conlon is alone in a small
flat on the south coast of England. His voice on the phone is desperate.
"I can see them, the men I saw die in prison," he
says. "There was one who got some glue and cut up his mattress and glued
the bits to his body and then set himself alight. I can still smell the
burning flesh. I can't get it out of my mind."
There are lots of things Gerry Conlon can't get out
of his mind. There is the sight of his father, Giuseppe, also wrongly branded
a terrorist, wasting away in prison before his eyes. He can remember the
beatings. He has nightmares about being stripped, spat and urinated upon.
And the sound of boots echoing on metal, coming closer to his cell.
Conlon was 35 when he was freed on appeal. Now, after
years of alcohol and drug abuse – including crack cocaine – he is in trouble.
For, like all his fellow victims of miscarriages of justice – the Birmingham
Six, the Bridgewater Three and others, less well-known – Conlon was thrust
into a shameful vacuum, a place where people like him were forgotten by
the state.
"We got no help whatsoever, no support, no counselling,"
he says, "but we were so terribly, terribly damaged. I still am. I never
had a single thought about killing myself in prison, but now I think about
nothing else. I plan it, I buy things to do it. I have a knife and some
rope and lots of pills. If not them, then I have my balcony. I keep it
locked for now because I dream of jumping off it. Prison was better than
this."
A lot of people are concerned about Gerry Conlon,
and are trying to help. But they are not officials, professionals or representatives
of the state. Instead they are fellow victims of miscarriages of justice,
men and women whose campaigning has switched from releasing innocent people
to keeping them in one piece now that they are free.And at the heart of
this network are two of the members of the Birmingham Six.
Paddy Hill and Billy Power both served 16 years after
being convicted of the Birmingham pub bombings in 1974. They were released
on appeal in 1991. Today, despite never having received full compensation,
they repeatedly open their homes to other victims as they are freed into
a world that does nothing to help them.
One of the people they have taken in is Jim Robinson,
one of the Bridgewater Three (the men who were wrongfully convicted of
the murder of newspaper boy Carl Bridgewater in 1979). He served 18 years
before emerging with nowhere to live. Billy Power and his wife Nora gave
Robinson a home for more than six months.
Meanwhile, John Kamara, 44, is just the latest in
a series of guests at Paddy Hill's two-bedroom flat in Muswell Hill, north
London. He was freed in March after 19 years, when his conviction for the
murder of a Liverpool bookmaker was quashed (among the reasons for his
release was the discovery that the prosecution had withheld 201 witness
statements from the defence).
"Without Paddy's help, I'd be living rough on the
streets," says Kamara. "During my appeal in March, the judges announced
a 10-minute recess, then came back and quashed my conviction. That was
it. After 19 years, I was given a £46.75 discharge allowance and
a London Transport pass that expired at 8pm, and I was kicked out of the
side-door of the court."
After Hill came to his rescue, Kamara's experiences
mirrored those of all the victims.
"When I asked for income support," Kamara says, "one
of the people I saw said: 'You'll be getting compensation, won't you? Go
down to the bank and get a loan.' I went to the Woolwich but they turned
me down. I had to give 'prison' as my previous address."
Eventually, after Hill's doctor agreed to provide
temporary sick notes, Kamara found he was entitled to £52-a-week
income support. There will be compensation, but the interim is a miserable
place in which to live.
"You get no help at all," Hill says. "The judge quashes
your conviction and you feel elated, but then you emerge with no money,
no accommodation, no health care, no counselling, nothing to equip you
for the place you have been away from for so long."
For the time being, Kamara will stay in Hill's home.
There is an element of prison camaraderie in their existence. Kamara, a
lean Liverpudlian, has the "big" room – actually a small space, cluttered
with black bin-liners filled with the evidence that freed him. The boxroom
is reserved for Hill's 27-year-old son Sean, for when he returns from his
job as a travelling chef. There is no bed for Hill: he sleeps on the sofa.
Hill, who now runs the Miscarriages of Justice Organisation,
has had a steady stream of house guests, including Patrick Nicholls, who
served 23 years after being wrongfully convicted of murdering a friend.
He was almost 70 when he was released two years ago.
"When Paddy Nicholls came out," Hill says, "he knew
no one on the outside and had nowhere to go. He had had two strokes, and
was wheeled up to me, looking completely bewildered, by a prison guard.
He had a sponge ball in his hand to squeeze as part of his physiotherapy.
But they even took that off him.
"We tried to get him benefits, but he needed a sick
note. We tried to get him a doctor, but then he needed his medical records,
which were held by the prison service. He needed medication, so I rang
up his old prison to ask what it was. But they wouldn't tell me."
Gareth Peirce, the solicitor who represented both
the Guildford and Birmingham defendants, has also had to step into the
breach to help victims. She provided accommodation for more than six months
for Gerry Conlon and Judith Ward, the latter wrongly convicted of the 1974
M62 coach bombing in which 12 people died. She served 18 years.
"They had nowhere to go and there was no provision
for them from the state," Peirce says. "All of these people should have
been given the same kind of help as the returning hostages, John McCarthy,
Brian Keenan and Jackie Mann.
"A few years ago, Adrian Grounds, a psychiatrist
at the Institute of Criminology at Cambridge, examined Gerry Conlon and
four of the Birmingham Six. He found that they were suffering from irreversible
and disabling post-traumatic stress syndrome, and said that their mental
condition was similar to people whose brains had been damaged in car accidents."
For nine years, Sally Mulready, a benefits adviser
at the London-Irish Centre in Camden, north London, has been fighting the
benefits and pensions systems, wrangling with housing officers to try to
help the stream of miscarriage victims who emerge from prison.
"Paddy Nicholls was particularly bad," she says.
"I spent days with him during which he would just cry. But they are all
damaged in their own way. These people had dreams – but when they came
out, life didn't live up to their expectations.
"There needs to be a more rounded approach from the
Government. From day one, these people need proper care, and that's going
to cost money."
This week, the Government made one small step when
it announced that it would plug an appalling gap in provision for miscarriage
victims. It agreed to make up absent National Insurance contributions after
the Birmingham Six, some of whom are coming up to pensionable age, found
that they were not entitled to a state pension because they had paid no
"stamp" for 16 years – while they were wrongly imprisoned.
Victims are often deprived of sympathy because of
the assumption that they must be fabulously wealthy. "People sometimes
argue, 'Well, they get lots of compensation', but they don't," says Peirce.
"Once you deduct lost and projected earnings, the compensation element
of being wrongly locked up, beaten and abused for years, averages out at
about £13,000 a year."
The Birmingham Six have each received interim payments
of up to £300,000 – but they are arguing for more. This may seem
a lot of money, but it includes nine years' living expenses, and the purchase
of a home. And as they will be the first to admit, they all spent money
trying to buy the love of their children and their grandchildren.
"I was typical," Paddy Hill says. "I hadn't seen
my kids out of prison for 16 years, so I tried to build up a relationship
by buying things for everybody. What do you do when your grandchildren
run away from you because they're scared? You try to buy their love."
And compensation alone is not the answer. Michael
Hickey was just 17 when he was convicted, with Vincent Hickey and James
Robinson, of the Carl Bridgewater murder. When he came out 18 years later,
he needed therapy more than cash – but he was told to join a long NHS queue.
"He was clearly a damaged and broken person," his
mother, Ann Whelan, now says. "He wasn't equipped to deal with the world,
and I wasn't equipped to deal with him. He was given no professional support
at all. The pressures were massive and they proved too much for him."
Over a six-month period, Michael withdrew into himself,
not knowing how to deal with his new world. "We tried to teach him, but
it was difficult – he had never seen a microwave oven, a TV remote control
or a mobile phone," Ann says.
He would refuse to sleep in a double room, preferring
a cell-like box-room. His stomach could not cope with rich, non-prison
food. He would curl up and cover his head at the slightest noise. "He would
draw the curtains and stay in all day, crying," Ann recalls. "I would get
phone calls from people saying they had seen him in the middle of the night
simply sitting at the side of the road somewhere, looking into space.
"When he got some interim compensation, he either
just gave it away or people took it from him. He didn't care. He would
pace around the garden, talking to himself about things that happened in
prison.
"And, finally, one day he snapped. He was standing
in the garden, shoeless and in his shorts. He began screaming, and threw
his watch in the pond and a chair across the lawn. I was terrified – I
rang his solicitor to ask for advice and was told to call the police.
"In my panic, I did. When they arrived, they were
in riot gear carrying shields. Michael just went quiet and looked at me.
And then they took him away. They sent him to a psychiatric clinic near
Birmingham. Every time he breaks down, he goes back there for emergency
medication. It's happened about 10 times now.
"I broke my heart that day. I thought that after
18-and-a-half years' campaigning to get Michael out, I had been responsible
for him being incarcerated again, and I should never, ever have been placed
in that situation."
Meanwhile, Gerry Conlon lives alone, fighting his
past and his various addictions, never socialising, and angry that he believes
he will never form a relationship, never have a child.
But his pain, and that of the others, past and future,
could be allieviated if the state would only face up to its responsibilities
and give the help they need. There must surely be something wrong when
a man says, as Conlon did this week: "I was better off in prison."
Additional research: Morgen Weaver |