INNOCENT - Fighting miscarriages of justice

Andrew Adams Free After 14 Years

The Court of Appeal today quashed the conviction of Andrew Adams who was freed after serving more than 14 years in jail for the murder of Jack Royal in Newcastle on 19th March 1990.

"I am overwhelmed with all that has happened. A few minutes ago I was a prisoner serving a life sentence for a crime I did not commit. I am now a free man". Andrew Adams

"This is a great day, a sad day and a shameful day. It is a great day because, after being in prison for fourteen years for a crime he did not commit, Mr Adams' conviction has finally been quashed. It is a shameful day because the material which has led the Court of Appeal to quash Mr Adams' conviction was there for his original lawyers to examine - something they failed to do. Finally, it is a sad day because Mr Royal's murderers are still at large". Ben Rose, solicitor for Adams,

Background
Andrew Adams was born on 26th January 1970 and grew up in the West end of Newcastle upon Tyne. Having left school he went to work in his father's successful aircraft engineering workshop - Little Wings.

On the evening of 19 March 1990, Jack Royal died after he received a single shot gun wound to the face. Royal had previously been acquitted of the murder of David Thompson, on the basis of self-defence. David Thompson was the brother of Catherine Thompson, who was Adams' girlfriend.

The prosecution's case against Adams was that Catherine Thompson had persuaded him to murder Royal in revenge for the killing of her brother. It was alleged that the murder of Royal was carried out by Adams and his co-defendant and life long friend, John Hands. But Hands was acquitted of murder and Catherine Thompson acquitted of soliciting the murder of Royal.

The trial of the Adams, Hands and Catherine Thompson followed an unsuccessful prosecution of Walter Hepple for the murder of Royal. Hepple was acquitted by verdict of a jury on 26 June 1991. In April 1992, Kevin Thompson (no relation of David Thompson) gave information to the police and was subsequently the principal witness at the Adams trial.

Adams was arrested in May 1992 and tried and convicted in April 1993. He was represented by a local firm; John Foley & Co. Andrew's first appeal was heard and dismissed by the Court of Appeal in 1997. Almost immediately afterwards, Andrew applied to the recently created Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). In 2000 he instructed Ben Rose, from Hickman & Rose, to assist with that application.

As a result of the painstaking work of his lawyers the CCRC finally referred Adams' case back to the Court of Appeal in September 2005. The grounds included an allegation that his original trial lawyers had failed to properly prepare the case.

Adams second Appeal took place in December 2006. Today the Court of Appeal has ruled that his conviction was unsafe and ordered that it be quashed.

Evidence the jury never heard
Hickman & Rose Solicitors assigned a team of two lawyers and 5 assistants to work full-time on the appeal. More than 40,000 pages of evidence were considered in the lead-up to the appeal hearing. Yet the barristers who represented Adams in the 1993 trial had only 10 days in which to prepare. It was not nearly enough.

As a result of the failure to prepare properly for trial, the jury did not hear significant evidence about the main prosecution witness, Kevin Thompson. Importantly, the jury never learned that Thompson had two "off the record" conversations with Northumbria police officers, each conversation happening the day before Thompson made grave allegations against Adams. An earlier tape recorded interview with Thompson disappeared in mysterious circumstances. In Adams' first Appeal, in 1997, the Court of Appeal described the way in which the police documented their contact with Thompson as "deplorable and inexcusable" and "to say the least, surprising".

The jury also did not hear all the evidence from witnesses who suggested that Thompson was wrong about a 'getaway route', and also lying about Adams' movements in the hour before the shooting.

"Andrew's case was prepared by Mary Foley, an unqualified and unsupervised clerk with John Foley & Co. The situation became worse when the barristers who were instructed were chosen because they had represented another man who had previously been charged and acquitted of the same crime. Those barristers had to withdraw late in the day and the Court has now confirmed it was 'a clear error' that John Foley & Co chose them and that the barristers ever accepted the instructions." Ben Rose

Before leaving to celebrate with family and friends Andrew Adams said:

"During the past fourteen years my mum has died, my friends have got married, settled down and had children, whilst I have been in prison. I will now return to Newcastle and begin to rebuild the life I once had. I am so grateful to all those who have stood by me. Without them I would not be here today".

For more information contact Ben Rose on 020 7936 9420

Convicted in 1994 of the murder of Tyneside science teacher Jack Royal on the flimsy evidence of an armed robber, and the persuasive arguments of a juror who knew him, Andrew Adams had his conviction quashed on12 January 2007 .itv.com/news/	12 January 2007
Andrew Adams vows to help cellmate Andrew Davies clear his name 22 January 2007 (Andrew Davies lost his 2004 appeal against his conviction for the murder of Andrew Lansdown in 2001 - article in Northern Echo 29 October 2004)
Third suspect in Royal case revealed 21 January 2007
Verdict was wrong, say murder jurors For the first time in legal history a jury will give evidence to help a jailed killer's bid for freedom...by David Rose read more	December 3, 2006
Who really killed Jack Royal? - thorough article on the case by David Rose	26 February 2006
The CCRC concluded that the case ought to be referred to the Court of Appeal because. Mr Adams had received inadequate legal representation by solicitors and counsel. There had been material non-disclosure by the prosecution. There had been errors in the summing up.
Andrew Adams Free After 14 Years The Court of Appeal today quashed the conviction of Andrew Adams who was freed after serving more than 14 years in jail for the murder of Jack Royal in Newcastle on 19th March 1990. "I am overwhelmed with all that has happened. A few minutes ago I was a prisoner serving a life sentence for a crime I did not commit. I am now a free man". Andrew Adams "This is a great day, a sad day and a shameful day. It is a great day because, after being in prison for fourteen years for a crime he did not commit, Mr Adams' conviction has finally been quashed. It is a shameful day because the material which has led the Court of Appeal to quash Mr Adams' conviction was there for his original lawyers to examine - something they failed to do. Finally, it is a sad day because Mr Royal's murderers are still at large". Ben Rose, solicitor for Adams, Background Andrew Adams was born on 26th January 1970 and grew up in the West end of Newcastle upon Tyne. Having left school he went to work in his father's successful aircraft engineering workshop - Little Wings. On the evening of 19 March 1990, Jack Royal died after he received a single shot gun wound to the face. Royal had previously been acquitted of the murder of David Thompson, on the basis of self-defence. David Thompson was the brother of Catherine Thompson, who was Adams' girlfriend. The prosecution's case against Adams was that Catherine Thompson had persuaded him to murder Royal in revenge for the killing of her brother. It was alleged that the murder of Royal was carried out by Adams and his co-defendant and life long friend, John Hands. But Hands was acquitted of murder and Catherine Thompson acquitted of soliciting the murder of Royal. The trial of the Adams, Hands and Catherine Thompson followed an unsuccessful prosecution of Walter Hepple for the murder of Royal. Hepple was acquitted by verdict of a jury on 26 June 1991. In April 1992, Kevin Thompson (no relation of David Thompson) gave information to the police and was subsequently the principal witness at the Adams trial. Adams was arrested in May 1992 and tried and convicted in April 1993. He was represented by a local firm; John Foley & Co. Andrew's first appeal was heard and dismissed by the Court of Appeal in 1997. Almost immediately afterwards, Andrew applied to the recently created Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC). In 2000 he instructed Ben Rose, from Hickman & Rose, to assist with that application. As a result of the painstaking work of his lawyers the CCRC finally referred Adams' case back to the Court of Appeal in September 2005. The grounds included an allegation that his original trial lawyers had failed to properly prepare the case. Adams second Appeal took place in December 2006. Today the Court of Appeal has ruled that his conviction was unsafe and ordered that it be quashed. Evidence the jury never heard Hickman & Rose Solicitors assigned a team of two lawyers and 5 assistants to work full-time on the appeal. More than 40,000 pages of evidence were considered in the lead-up to the appeal hearing. Yet the barristers who represented Adams in the 1993 trial had only 10 days in which to prepare. It was not nearly enough. As a result of the failure to prepare properly for trial, the jury did not hear significant evidence about the main prosecution witness, Kevin Thompson. Importantly, the jury never learned that Thompson had two "off the record" conversations with Northumbria police officers, each conversation happening the day before Thompson made grave allegations against Adams. An earlier tape recorded interview with Thompson disappeared in mysterious circumstances. In Adams' first Appeal, in 1997, the Court of Appeal described the way in which the police documented their contact with Thompson as "deplorable and inexcusable" and "to say the least, surprising". The jury also did not hear all the evidence from witnesses who suggested that Thompson was wrong about a 'getaway route', and also lying about Adams' movements in the hour before the shooting. "Andrew's case was prepared by Mary Foley, an unqualified and unsupervised clerk with John Foley & Co. The situation became worse when the barristers who were instructed were chosen because they had represented another man who had previously been charged and acquitted of the same crime. Those barristers had to withdraw late in the day and the Court has now confirmed it was 'a clear error' that John Foley & Co chose them and that the barristers ever accepted the instructions." Ben Rose Before leaving to celebrate with family and friends Andrew Adams said: "During the past fourteen years my mum has died, my friends have got married, settled down and had children, whilst I have been in prison. I will now return to Newcastle and begin to rebuild the life I once had. I am so grateful to all those who have stood by me. Without them I would not be here today". For more information contact Ben Rose on 020 7936 9420
Hickman and Rose Solicitors represented Andrew Adams. They "specialise in cases involving allegations of poor work in criminal cases by solicitors and counsel." Source: "Daniel Machover" <DMachover@hickmanandrose.co.uk> [relayed by MOJUK]